(2015-11-22) Dignan Picking Self-Organization Model
Aaron Dignan on How to choose a model of Self Organization that works for you... (cf 2013-12-23-3NewOrganizationModels)
While the reality is incredibly complex, there seem to be two characteristics that have the biggest impact which new form of self-organization will fit and spread. Scale (in terms of headcount - 3 levels) and Risk (in terms of exposure to serious consequences - 2 levels). (Reminds me of Alistair Cockburn's matrix that includes Crystal Clear.)
- Small/Low: OpenAllocation, Holacracy, Sociocracy; Buffer, Medium
- Small/High: Holacracy, SkunkWorks
- Medium/Low: Agile Squads, Niels Pflaeging, Holacracy, Open Allocation; Spotify, Zappos, Valve Software
- Medium/High: TeamOfTeams, Self Management; Morningstar, JSOC
- Large/Low: Lattice Organization, Open Organization, Chaordic; W L Gore, RedHat, Haier (link), Buurtzorg (link)
- Large/High: ???
Low Scale | Medium | High | |
---|---|---|---|
Low Risk | OpenAllocation, Holacracy, Sociocracy; Buffer, Medium | Agile Squads, Niels Pflaeging, Holacracy, Open Allocation; Spotify, Zappos, Valve Software | TeamOfTeams, Self Management; Morningstar, JSOC |
High | Holacracy, SkunkWorks | TeamOfTeams, Self Management; Morningstar, JSOC | Lattice Organization, Open Organization, Chaordic; W L Gore, RedHat, Haier, Buurtzorg |
Edited: | Tweet this! | Search Twitter for discussion